Erector Spinae Plane Block Group Research Articles

Effectiveness of the Bilateral and Bilevel Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial.

This study aimed to compare the effect of the ultrasound-guided bilateral and bilevel erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on pain scores, opioid requirement, intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), and stress response to surgery expressed by the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) versus standard analgesia methods following idiopathic scoliosis surgery. This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Sixty patients aged 10 to 18 years and physical status ASA 1 or 2 were randomized into 2 equal groups, each receiving an ESPB or sham block. The primary outcome was the pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale, NRS) within 48 hours after spinal correction and fusion surgery for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. The secondary outcomes were total opioid consumption, NLR, and PLR levels at 12 and 24 hours postoperatively and intraoperative MEPs. ESPB patients presented lower NRS scores, signifying less pain, at all time points (30, 60, 90, 120 min; and 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery), all P<0.0001. The total opioid consumption, the incidence of nausea or vomiting, and the need for remifentanil and propofol during surgery were significantly lower in the ESPB group. The surgery-induced stress response expressed by NLR and PLR was considerably lower in the ESPB group. ESPB did not affect the intraoperative MEP's amplitude. ESPB is effective for postoperative analgesia, can reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing scoliosis surgery, and reduces the stress response to surgery. ESPB does not interfere with neuromonitoring. Level I.

A Comparative Analysis of Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Conscious Sedation in Managing Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Pain.

This study investigates the efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for managing perioperative and postoperative pain in patients undergoing percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) for acute cholecystitis, particularly in high-risk elderly patients with extensive comorbidities and limited functional status. In a retrospective single-center study, 58 high-risk patients scheduled for PC were assessed. ESPB was administered to 23 patients, while 22 received conscious sedation. Pain intensity was measured using the numeric rating scale before any analgesic or ESPB administration, during the procedure and at 1 and 12h post-procedure and secondary outcomes included adverse effects and additional analgesic requirements. The ESPB group experienced significant pain reduction during and post-procedure compared to the conscious sedation group (p = 0.002). Procedure times were shorter (p = 0.015), and postoperative tramadol was less frequently needed in the ESPB group (p = 0.007). The incidence of nausea was also lower in the ESPB group (p = 0.001). No ESPB-related complications were reported. ESPB significantly alleviates perioperative and postoperative pain in PC patients, reducing additional analgesic use and side effects. It holds promise as a key component of pain management for high-risk surgical patients. Level 3, Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.

Evaluating the Efficacy of the Erector Spinae Plane Block as a Supplementary Approach to Cardiac Anesthesia during Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery via Median Sternotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Pain control after off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) facilitates mobilization and improves outcomes. The efficacy of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) after cardiac surgery remains controversial. Methods: We aimed to investigate the analgesic effects of ESPB after OPCAB. Precisely 56 patients receiving OPCAB were randomly divided into ESPB and control groups. The primary outcome was visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the dose of rescue analgesics in terms of oral morphine milligram equivalents, the dose of antiemetics, the length of intubation time, and the length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Results: The VAS scores were similar at all time points in both groups. The incidence of severe pain (VAS score > 7) was significantly lower in the ESPB group (50% vs. 15.4%; p = 0.008). The dose of rescue analgesics was also lower in the ESPB group (19.04 ± 18.76, 9.83 ± 12.84, p = 0.044) compared with the control group. The other secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Conclusions: ESPB provides analgesic efficacy by reducing the incidence of severe pain and opioid use after OPCAB.

Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of erector spinae plane block during coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized clinical trial

The search for a method of perioperative pain control after coronary bypass surgery is relevant both from the point of view of safety and effectiveness of the methods used.Aim: To evaluate the hemodynamic changes and effectiveness of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.Methodology and research methods. The prospective randomized single-center study included 45 patients equally distributed according to the applied methods of perioperative analgesia into 3 groups: general anesthesia with epidural anesthesia (GA + EA group, n = 15), general anesthesia with ESPB (GA + ESPB group, n = 15) and general anesthesia without any regional anesthesia techniques (GA group, n = 15). Assessment of hemodynamics and severity of pain syndrome was performed during the first postoperative day.Results. The intraoperative dose of fentanyl was 0.4 (0.4–0.5) mg in the GA + EA group, and 0.4 (0.3–0.4) mg in the GA + ESPB group that is significantly less than in the GA group – 1.1 (1.0–1.1) mg (p &lt; 0.001). Postoperatively, the dose of fentanyl was 0.10±0.04 mg in the GA + EA group and 0.23±0.05 mg in the GA group (p &lt; 0.001), whereas in the ESPB group fentanyl was not used. The pain level assessed by the numeric rating scale (NRS) was 3.0 (2.0–4.0) points at one hour after tracheal extubation and 3.0 (0.5–3.5) points at the end of the first day of the postoperative period without difference between the groups. The systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics, respiratory and vasopressor support did not differ as well.Conclusion. The use of regional anesthesia (EA and ESPB) provides similar quality of perioperative analgesia like general anesthesia, but leads to reduction in opioid doses. Postoperatively, the use of ESPB does not lead to a deterioration of the hemodynamic status of the patient.

Erector Spinae Plane Block Decreases Narcotic Requirements in Patients Undergoing Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-defibrillator Placement Under Sedation.

Providing adequate analgesia perioperatively during subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantation can be a challenge. The objective of our study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block technique in providing analgesia and minimizing the risk of opioid use in high-risk patient populations. We enrolled consecutive patients >18 years of age undergoing S-ICD implantation from February 2020 to February 2022 at our center prospectively. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the ESP block or traditional wound infiltration. A total of 24 patients were enrolled, including 13 patients randomized to ESP block and 11 patients as controls who received only wound infiltration. The primary outcome assessed was the overall use of perioperative analgesic medications in the ESP block group versus the surgical wound infiltration group. A significant reduction in intraoperative fentanyl use was observed [median ([interquartile range]) in the ESP block group (0 [0-50] μg) compared to the wound infiltration block group (75 [50-100] μg) (P = .001). The overall postoperative day (POD) 0 fentanyl use was also significantly decreased (75 [50-100] μg) in the ESP block group compared to the surgical wound infiltration group (100 [87.5-150] μg) (P = .049). There was also a trend of decreased POD 0 oxycodone-acetaminophen use. Finally, the number of days to discharge was less in the ESP block group. These results indicate that ESP block is an innovative, safe, and effective technique that decreases intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption and may be a useful adjunct pain-management technique in these high-risk patients. Larger studies are needed to further validate its use.

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial: optimisation of perioperative analgesia protocol for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

IntroductionPostoperative pain after thoracic surgery impairs patients’ quality of life and increases the incidence of respiratory complications. Optimised analgesia strategies include minimally invasive incisions, regional analgesia and early chest tube...

Original research: Dexmedetomidine versus ketamine in erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia following modified radical mastectomy: A prospective randomized controlled blinded study

ABSTRACT Background A significant postoperative pain has been documented in numerous breast cancer cases following modified radical mastectomy (MRM). We evaluated the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine (DEX) versus ketamine as adjuvants to local anaesthetic in erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in MRM. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 75 women with breast cancer scheduled for MRM were included. All patients underwent ESPB with 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine and randomized into three equal groups: group A, ESPB group; group B: received 1 µg/kg DEX with the ESPB; and group C: given 0.5 mg/kg Ketamine with the block. Results Compared with group A, VAS score at rest as well as movement were lower considerably in groups B and C (p < 0.05) at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h. Group B had lower VAS scores at rest at 12 h and 24 h and during movement at 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h (p < 0.05) than group C. In comparison to A Group; B and C Groups required considerably less time to rescue analgesia and consumed significantly fewer total opioids (p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, total number of patients who required additional analgesia was markedly reduced in groups B and C compared to group A ;(p < 0.05). Conclusion In MRM surgery, the postoperative opioids consumption and VAS values were lower in both groups DEX and ketamine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine which enhanced the analgesic profile and prolonged ESPB duration compared to ESPB alone, with DEX being superior to ketamine.

Serratus anterior plane block (posterior approach) versus erector spinae plane block in modified radical mastectomy; A randomized comparative trial

ABSTRACT Background Regional analgesia as Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) and Serratus Anterior Plane Block (SAPB) were used successfully for the control of perioperative pain in females undergoing modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Methods The trial included 56 females aged between 20 and 60 years old who had undergone MRM and were allocated into two groups (28 patients in each), group (I) for SAPB (posterior approach) and group (II) for ESPB. Measurements included demographic data, hemodynamic change, oxygen saturation, pain intensity by the visual analogue scale (VAS), sensory loss including axillary coverage and shoulder pain, incidence of neuropathic pain, total analgesic requirements, patient satisfaction and complications. Results Demographic data, hemodynamic changes and oxygen saturation showed statistically insignificant differences. There were insignificant differences in the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain at rest and on movement between the two groups on the first postoperative day (p-value >0.278 and 0.111 respectively). ESPB provided significantly more segmental sensory loss than SAPB (posterior approach) (p-value <0.031). We reported statistically insignificant differences in terms of total morphine consumption, the first request for analgesia and total local anaesthetic consumption (p-value = 0.408, 0.916 and 0.574 respectively), axillary sensory loss, inferior shoulder pain (p-value = 0.763), the incidence of neuropathic pain assessed by the Deuleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) scale after one week and one month (p-value = 1.000 and 0.554 respectively), Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) score, and patient satisfaction (p-value = 0.887) between the two groups with no documented complications. Conclusion We concluded that SAPB (posterior approach) and ESPB are safe and effective analgesic modalities for MRM with insignificant differences except for the more blocked dermatomes in the ESPB group.

Comparison of the effect of erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia on neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio in patients operated for breast cancer

Objectives: It was seen that recurrence and metastasis after breast cancer surgery are related to the immune response of the host. Anesthetic agents modulate the surgical stress response or directly impair the functions of immune system cells. In our study, we aimed to compare the effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and erector spinae plane block, which are among the methods we use for postoperative analgesia, on the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Methods: One hundred female patients aged 18-75 years, scheduled for unilateral breast cancer surgery, and who agreed to participate were included in our study. These cases were divided into two groups of the analgesia method: Those with erector spinae plane block (Group E) and those who were administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Group N). According to the results, preoperative and postoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio values were calculated and recorded. Results: Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio were statistically higher in both groups in the postoperative period. No statistically significant difference was found when the preoperative and postoperative measurement changes of the laboratory parameters between the groups were compared. Postoperative VAS scores were statistically significantly lower in Group E. Conclusions: We concluded that when erector spinae plane block and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use were compared in managing postoperative analgesia in breast cancer surgery, their effects on the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and platelet/lymphocyte ratio were not superior to each other. However, the erector spinae plane block was superior for adequate pain control.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia after caesarean delivery: a prospective randomized non-inferiority clinical trial

Abstract Background and Aims: Regional techniques are a part of multimodal analgesia following cesarean delivery. Cesarean delivery warrants a regional technique, which can provide somatic and visceral analgesia-like quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB). In this study, we investigated the non-inferiority of ESPB at T12 and transmuscular-QLB (TQLB) at L2-L3 for postoperative analgesia in cesarean delivery. Material and Methods: In this prospective, randomized, non-inferiority trial, 124 patients undergoing cesarean delivery were enrolled to receive bilateral TQLB or ESPB with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine on each side. All patients received prophylactic acetaminophen and ketorolac for 2 days. Our primary objective was to compare the total tramadol consumption in the first 48 h between the two groups. Secondary objectives were to compare cumulative tramadol consumption, postoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score at rest, and with movement at various time points, the time for first rescue analgesic requirement, development of complications related to the block, and patient satisfaction with analgesia between the two groups. Results: The total tramadol consumption in 48 h (47.3 ± 34.9 mg in ESPB and 50.9 ± 38.7 mg in TQLB), duration of first rescue analgesic (22.8 ± 15.8 h in ESPB and 22.7 ± 15.6 h in TQLB), and patient satisfaction were similar between the two groups. Both groups had similar pain scores except at rest at 6 h and on movement at 4 h, 6 h, and 36 h, whereas the ESPB group had lower NRS scores (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusion: The analgesic effect of bilateral ESPB at T12 was non-inferior to that of bilateral TQLB post-caesarean delivery. Key Message: What is already known about the topic: Cesarean delivery warrants a regional analgesia technique which can provide somatic and visceral analgesia postoperatively. While quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is a well-established technique for cesarean delivery there are very few comparative studies on erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in cesarean delivery. In the studies comparing ESPB for other lower abdominal procedures, it has been given at T9 only. What new information this study adds: The analgesic effect of bilateral ESPB at T12 was non-inferior to that of bilateral TQLB performed at L2-L3 with the same volume post-cesarean delivery and can be an important addition to multimodal analgesia protocols after cesarean delivery.

Comparisons in analgesic effects between ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and surgical intercostal nerve block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveThis study aimed to compare the analgesic effects of anesthesiologist-administrated erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and surgeon-administrated intercostal nerve block (ICNB) following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). DesignRandomized, controlled, double-blinded study. SettingOperating room, postoperative recovery room and ward in two centers. PatientsOne hundred patients, ASA I-III and scheduled for elective VATS. InterventionsThe anesthesiologist-administrated ESPB under ultrasound guidance or surgeon-administrated ICNB under video-assisted thoracoscopy was randomly provided during VATS. Regular oral non-opioid analgesic combined with intravenous rescue morphine were prescribed for multimodal analgesia after surgery. MeasurementsThe primary outcomes were the pain score and morphine consumption during 48 h after surgery. Postoperative pain intensity were assessed using the 10-cm visual analogue scale at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery. Morphine consumption at these time points was compared between the two study groups. Furthermore, oral weak opioid rescue analgesic was also provided at 24 h after surgery. Postoperative quality of recovery at 24 h was also assessed using the QoR-15 questionnaire, along with duration of chest tube drainage and hospital stay were compared as secondary outcomes. Main resultsPatients in the two study groups had comparable baseline characteristics, and surgical types were also similar. Postoperative VAS changes at 1 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery were also comparable between the two study groups. Both groups had low median scores (<4.0) at all time points (all p > 0.05). Patients in the ESPB group required statistically non-significant higher 48-h morphine consumption [3 (0–6) vs. 0 (0–6) mg in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.135] and lower numbers of oral rescue analgesic (0.4 ± 1.2 vs. 1.0 ± 1.8 in the ESPB group and ICNB group respectively; p = 0.059). Additionally, patients in the two study groups had similar QoR15 scores and lengths of hospital stay. ConclusionsBoth anesthesiologist-administered ultrasound-guided ESPB and surgeon-administered VATS ICNB were effective analgesic techniques for patients undergoing VATS for tumor resection.

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block in patients with chronic lumbar facet joint pain: A prospective case-controlled study.

The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane (ESP) block and compare with the conventional physical therapy in chronic low back pain (LBP). This prospective case-controlled study included patients with chronic LBP. Their clinical and demographic data were obtained, and they were divided into two groups for conventional physical therapy and ESP blocks. Prior to treatment, on the first day, the second week, and the third month, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were evaluated. The study included 43 patients, 21 in the ESP block group and 22 in the conventional physical therapy group. The VAS in movement was higher in the ESP block group at baseline (p = 0.047). On the first day after the treatments, the ESP block group showed lower resting (p < 0.001) and movement (p = 0.001) VAS values than the conventional physical therapy group. At the end of 3 months, both groups had improved VAS and ODI scores (all p < 0.001). US-guided ESP block might be considered a successful, safe, and technically simple alternative treatment in patients with chronic LBP to control pain and reduce the cost of physical therapy and lost workdays.

Three ultrasound guided plane blocks for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial

Background &amp;objective: Transmuscular quadratus lumborum plane block (QLPB), paravertebral plane block (PVPB), and erector spinae plane block (ESPB) are three regional anesthesia techniques for management of perioperative pain for surgical procedures on the trunk, including thorax and abdomen. We compared the effectiveness of PVPB, QLPB type III (QL3), and ESPB for perioperative analgesia during radical cystectomy performed for bladder cancer.&#x0D; Methodology: This randomized double-blind trial was performed on 120 patients, aged above 18 years, undergoing radical cystectomy under general anesthesia. Individuals were randomly divided into 3 equal groups: ESPB, PVPB, and QLPB. Blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance preoperatively on each side with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Time to perform block and time to the first dose of morphine postoperatively, were noted. Intra-operative hemodynamic data, including MAP and heart rate (HR) were noted every 10 min for an hour, and then at 30 min intervals. Postoperatively, MAP and HR were recorded at 0, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours. The connection between qualitative factors was investigated using the chi-square test and Fisher's exact test. For the purpose of comparing the groups, one-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni correction were used. A two-tailed P value &lt; 0.05 was considered significant.&#x0D; Results: Time to perform block was substantially reduced in ESPB and QL3 groups compared to PVPB group. Time to the first dose of morphine was substantially delayed in the PVPB group than ESPB and QL3 groups. Total 24 h morphine consumption was substantially lower in the PVPB group than ESPB and QL3 groups. Postoperative visual analog scale measurements were substantially lower at 15 min, 30 min, and 12 h in the PVPB group than ESPB and QL3 groups and at 6 h in the ESPB and QL3 groups than in PVPB group. Postoperative mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate measurements were substantially reduced at 0 and 12 h in the PVPB group than in ESPB and QL3 groups and at 6 h in the ESPB and QL3 groups than in PVPB group.&#x0D; Conclusions: The ultrasound guided paravertebral plane block was superior to quadratus lumborum plane block type III and erector spinae plane block in providing more effective analgesia but with higher time to perform block.&#x0D; Abbreviations: ESPB- Erector Spinae Plane Block; PVPB- Paravertebral Plane Block; QLPB- Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block; QL3- Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block Type III&#x0D; Keywords: Paravertebral Plane Block; Quadratus Lumborum Plane Block; Erector Spinae Plane Block; Ultrasound; Radical Cystectomy&#x0D; Citation: Seif NE, El-Kholy MM, Ali AR, Zalat MM, Elshazly M. Three ultrasound guided plane blocks for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(1):85-91; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i1.2381&#x0D; Received: September 28, 2023; Reviewed: October 31, 2023; Accepted: October 31, 2023

Ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in open nephrectomy for renal malignancy: a randomized controlled study

Background &amp; objective: Pain during nephrectomy has been reported to be extremely intense and may trigger complex biochemical and physiological stress response if managed inadequately. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) both have been advocated for pain management in adult patients undergoing open nephrectomy under general anesthesia. We compared the efficacy and the dynamics of both of these procedures.&#x0D; Methodology: This was a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial involving 54 patients were undergoing open nephrectomy for malignant kidney tumors. All patients were ASA class II, had a BMI 20-40 kg/m2, and were between the ages of 18-65 y. Through random assignment, people were divided into two identical, equivalent groups: Group A (n = 27) received TEA, whereas Group B (n = 27) received US-guided continuous ESPB. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and intraoperative heart rate (HR) were recorded before and after incision, and at 30 min, 1 h, and 1.5 h. Postoperative HR, MAP were recorded at 6 h and 12 h, both at rest and when moving. Numerical rating scale (NRS) score was used to compare the intensity of postoperative pain.&#x0D; Results: Postoperative HR, MAP, at 6 h and 12 h, at rest and when moving, were substantially reduced in the TEA group than those in the ESPB group. The NRS score of the ESPB group was substantially greater than that of the TEA group. In contrast to the TEA group, much more total amount of morphine was consumed in the ESPB group. The time to first rescue analgesia was substantially shorter in ESPB group than that of the TEA group.&#x0D; Conclusions: The results of our study prove that US guided erector spinae plane block is effective in providing postoperative analgesia, decreasing use of intraoperative and postoperative opioids in patients having open nephrectomy. However, it is still inferior to thoracic epidural analgesia in terms of pain control after 6 h postoperatively. Otherwise, erector spinae plane block has fewer side effects compared to thoracic epidural analgesia. So, it may be used as an alternative to thoracic epidural analgesia.&#x0D; Key words: Erector Spinae Plane Block; Epidural Analgesia; Open Nephrectomy; Pain, Postoperative; Ultrasound&#x0D; Citation: Wadood MA, Abdelrahman MA, Mostafe MM, Abdelghafar EM. Ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia in open nephrectomy for renal malignancy: a randomized controlled study, Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(1):26-32; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i1.2377&#x0D; Received July 24, 2023; Revised: September 08, 2023; Accepted: October 03, 2023

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on analgesia and quality of recovery after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery: protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundMinimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery offers an effective option for coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with the avoidance of median sternotomy and fast postoperative recovery. However, MIDCAB is still associated with significant postoperative pain which may lead to delayed recovery. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a superficial fascial plane block. There have not been randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of ESPB on analgesia and patient recovery following MIDCAB surgery. We therefore designed a double-blind prospective randomized placebo-controlled trial, aiming to prove the hypothesis that ESPB reduces postoperative pain scores in patients undergoing MIDCAB surgery.MethodsThe study protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital. Sixty adult patients of either sex scheduled for MIDCAB surgery under general anesthesia (GA) will be included. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either a preoperative single-shot ESPB with 30 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% (ESPB group) or normal saline 0.9% (control group). The primary outcomes are the difference between the two groups in numeric rating scale (NRS) scores at rest at different time points (6, 12, 18, 24, 48 h) after surgery. The secondary outcomes include NRS scores on deep inspiration within 48 h, postoperative hydromorphone consumption, and quality of patient recovery at 24 h and 48 h, using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scale. The other outcomes include intraoperative fentanyl requirements, the need for additional postoperative rescue analgesics, time to tracheal extubation and chest tube removal after surgery, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital discharge time, and 30-day mortality. Adverse events will be also evaluated.DiscussionThis is a novel randomized controlled study evaluating a preoperative ultrasound-guided single-shot unilateral ESPB on analgesia and quality of patient recovery in MIDCAB surgery. The results of this study will characterize the degree of acute postoperative pain and clinical outcomes following MIDCAB. Our study may help optimizing analgesia regimen selection and improving patient comfort in this specific population.Trial registrationThe study was prospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (trial identifier: ChiCTR2100052810). Date of registration: November 5, 2021.

Effect of ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain and inflammatory response in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundA single injection of local anaesthetic (LA) in the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can reduce pain after modified radical mastectomy (MRM) surgery, but the duration of analgesia is affected by the duration of the LA. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of continuous ESPB on acute and chronic pain and inflammatory response after MRM surgery.MethodsIn this prospective, randomised, controlled trial, we will recruit 160 patients, aged 18–80 years, scheduled for elective MRM surgery under general anaesthesia. They will be randomly assigned to two groups: a continuous ESPB group (group E) and a sham block group (group C). Both groups of patients will have a nerve block (group C pretended to puncture) and an indwelling catheter fixed prior to surgery. Electronic pumps containing LA are shielded. The primary outcome is the total consumption of analgesic agents. The secondary outcomes include the levels of inflammation-related cytokines; the occurrence of chronic pain (post-mastectomy pain syndrome, PMPS); static and dynamic pain scores at 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively; and post-operative and post-puncture adverse reactions.DiscussionAnalgesia after MRM surgery is important and chronic pain can develop when acute pain is prolonged, but the analgesic effect of a nerve block with a single injection of LA is limited by the duration of drug action. The aim of this trial is to investigate whether continuous ESPB can reduce acute pain after MRM surgery and reduce the incidence of chronic pain (PMPS), with fewer postoperative analgesic drug-related complications and less inflammatory response. Continuous ESPB and up to 12 months of follow-up are two innovations of this trial.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (https://www.chictr.org.cn/) ChiCTR2200061935. Registered on 11 July 2022. This trial is a prospective registry with the following registry names: Effect of ultrasound-guided continuous erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain and inflammatory response in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.

Analgesic Strategies for Urologic Videolaparoscopic or Robotic Surgery in the Context of an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol: A Prospective Study Comparing Erector Spinae Plane Block versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block.

Regional anesthesia in postoperative pain management has developed in recent years, especially with the advent of fascial plane blocks. This study aims to compare the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus the ultrasound-guided bilateral transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) on postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic or robotic urologic surgery. This was a prospective observational study; 97 patients (ESPB-group) received bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.375% plus 0.5 mcg/kg of dexmedetomidine in each side at the level of T7-T9 and 93 patients (TAPB-group) received bilateral ultrasound-guided TAPB with 20 mL ropivacaine 0.375% or 0.25%. The primary outcome was the postoperative numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score, which was significantly lower in the ESPB group on postoperative days 0, 1, 2, and 3 (p < 0.001) and, consequently, the number of patients requiring postoperative supplemental analgesic rescue therapies was significantly lower (p < 0.001). Concerning the secondary outcomes, consumption of ropivacaine was significantly lower in the group (p < 0.001) and the total amount of analgesic rescue doses was significantly lower in the ESPB-group than the TAPB-group in postoperative days from 2 to 4 (1 vs. 3, p > 0.001). Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was higher in the TAPB group and no block-related complications were observed. Our data indicate that ESPB provides postoperative pain control at least as good as TAPB plus morphine, with less local anesthetic needed.

The efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus freehand ESPB in postoperative pain management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a randomized, non-inferiority trial.

Spine surgeries have experienced exponential growth over the past 2 decades. These surgeries are often accompanied by long and severe perioperative pain, presenting a significant management challenge. This study aims to assess and compare the efficacy of two techniques for postoperative pain (POP) management in lumbar spine surgeries: ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and intraoperative freehand ESPB. In this prospective randomized non-inferiority trial (Registration Number: IRCT20221107056427N1), adult patients who were candidates for lumbar spinal fusion surgery were randomly divided into two groups: ultrasound-guided ESPB (n = 29) and freehand ESPB (n = 29). The primary outcomes were the total amount of morphine consumed during the first 24h following the surgery and the numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at various time points within the first 24h following the surgery. The secondary outcome was the fentanyl used during surgery. Participants in the intraoperative freehand approach had considerably higher total morphine consumption in the first postoperative 24h. The trend of NRS changes in both the ultrasound-guided ESPB group and the freehand ESPB group during the first 24h after surgery showed a significant decrease. Still, there was no significant difference between the two groups. However, the first analgesic demand time was significantly shorter in the intraoperative freehand ESPB group compared to the ultrasound-guided approach. According to our results, the ultrasound-guided approach of ESPB is more effective in POP management and opioid sparing in lumbar spinal fusion surgeries compared to the freehand approach. However, the data from this study are not sufficient to draw robust conclusions, and further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are required to validate our results.

Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomies surgery: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundLaparoscopic nephrectomy is a commonly utilized surgical approach for the management of renal cancer. Despite its widespread acceptance, postoperative pain management remains a significant challenge for many patients undergoing this procedure. Traditional pain management techniques, including opioid and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug administration, may not provide adequate pain relief and may result in adverse effects. In recent years, erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has emerged as a promising regional anesthesia technique due to its simplicity, safety, and potential efficacy in reducing postoperative pain. ESPB has demonstrated effectiveness in reducing postoperative pain in various surgical procedures. However, the efficacy of ESPB in laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cancer has not been extensively studied. As such, further investigation is necessary to determine the potential benefits of ESPB in this context. The addition of adjuvants such as dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone to nerve blocks has been shown to improve both the duration and quality of the block. Multiple studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of these adjuvants in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption and improving patient satisfaction. The use of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants for nerve blocks represents a promising approach for enhancing regional anesthesia and analgesia. In light of these findings, we have incorporated dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone into our nerve block protocol.MethodsThis study is a randomized controlled trial conducted at a single center, with 50 participants being randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the ESPB group or the control group. The trial aims to investigate the efficacy of ESPB in patients diagnosed with kidney cancer who are scheduled for laparoscopic nephrectomy. The primary outcome measure is the total consumption of intraoperative sufentanil. Secondary outcomes include the VAS score at rest and during coughing at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after surgery; total intraoperative remifentanil consumption; the number of times rescue analgesia is required; and the incidence of nausea and vomiting in the first 24 h after surgery. This study is registered for a duration of 1 year and is being conducted in China.DiscussionThe objective of our study is to evaluate the potential benefits of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy, with a focus on the impact of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants on the quality and duration of the block, as well as postoperative pain and opioid consumption. By investigating the effects of these adjuvants in the context of ESPB, we hope to contribute to the growing body of literature on the use of adjuvants in nerve blocks and provide further insight into the potential benefits of this approach for improving patient outcomes following laparoscopic nephrectomy. This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University.Trial registrationChina Clinical Trial Register ChiCTR2300068578. Registered on 20 February 2023.

The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus ultrasound-guided caudal epidural block for abdominal surgery in pediatric patients - A patient and assessor-blind, randomized controlled study.

Literature on the efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in pediatric patients is limited. Hence, we aimed to compare ESPB versus caudal epidural block (CEB) in children undergoing abdominal surgery. In this patient and assessor-blind study, fifty-two ASA I-II patients, between 1 to 9 years of age, were randomized into groups of 26 each. ESPB group received unilateral or bilateral ultrasound (USG)-guided ESPB with 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine per side. CEB group received USG-guided CEB with 1 ml/kg of 0.25% bupivacaine. The primary objective was to estimate the proportion of patients requiring postoperative rescue analgesia. The secondary objectives were to assess postoperative Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale scores, duration of analgesia, and consumption of rescue analgesic drugs. More patients in the ESPB group (88.4%), compared to the CEB group (42.3%), required rescue analgesics (P value <0.001). FLACC scores in the ESPB group, though satisfactory, were inferior, to the CEB group. The duration of postoperative analgesia was shorter in the ESPB group by 9.54 h (95% CI: 4.51 to 14.57 h, P value <0.001). The median (IQR) consumption of rescue paracetamol was significantly higher in the ESPB group (20 mg/kg (10,20) compared to the CEB group (0.0 mg/kg (0.0,10) P value <0.001)). No adverse effects were reported. In children undergoing abdominal surgery, both ESPB and CEB were safe and efficacious. CEB provided a longer duration and better quality of analgesia. ESPB may be considered when CEB is contraindicated or difficult.